|
Absolute deadness:
random quanta without recurrence By Bodhangkur That
sentence already does more philosophical work than most shelves of
metaphysics. Imagine it
properly. Not chaos, not turbulence, not fireworks of energy—but something
far colder and far more terminal: events that never happen twice.
Quanta flicker, vanish, reset. No memory. No bond. No echo. Nothing
accumulates. Nothing counts. That is not “mysterious nothingness.”
That is deadness proper. And
notice something unsettling: events still occur. Yet nothing happens. This is the
first slap to common sense. We are trained to think that motion, activity, or
energy means life. It doesn’t. A universe can be busy and still be dead.
Deadness is not inactivity. Deadness is failure to recur. Life
begins at a much humbler, much more scandalous point. The scandal: life begins when randomness fails Now
introduce the tiniest betrayal of randomness. Two
quanta do not merely appear and vanish independently. They entangle. A
relation forms. It happens again. And again. Suddenly, something has history.
A differential persists. A bond remembers itself. Nothing
biological has happened. No metabolism. No reproduction. No struggle for
survival. And yet something irreducible has appeared: A loop. That loop
is the true life primitive. Life does
not begin with cells. From that
point on, everything changes. Time appears—not as a background clock, but as counted
recurrence. Identity appears—not as substance, but as successful
repetition. Reality itself thickens. Randomness, exposed as a fraud This
brings us to the awkward question modern physics keeps skirting around: Is
randomness itself ever real? The
answer, once you stop flinching, is no. Ontological
randomness—events unconstrained by anything, leaving no trace, generating no
recurrence—is a logical mirage. The moment an event actually occurs,
something has been selected rather than nothing. A distinction exists. And
the moment a distinction exists, randomness has already failed. Pure
randomness cannot happen. If it did, it would no longer be random. So what
do we call “randomness”? Simple: recurrence
that doesn’t survive long enough to matter. Randomness
is not the opposite of order. Virtual
events, fluctuations, noise—these are not proof of a dead universe. They are
proof of a universe constantly trying to stabilise something and
mostly failing. Life is
what remains when it occasionally succeeds. Why hydrogen ruins our arrogance This is
where people start to get uncomfortable. If life
is persistent recurrence, then hydrogen—a stable, recurring solution to
quantum constraints—is not “dead matter.” It is a successful procedure.
It executes. It persists. It fails sometimes. It is vulnerable. So are we. The
difference between hydrogen and a human is not life versus non-life. It is recursion
depth. We are
not alive instead of atoms. Calling
the universe “dead matter with accidental life sprinkled on top” is not
scientific sobriety. It is pan-dead superstition inherited from bad
metaphysics. The universe is alive — and that’s not poetry At this
point the ancient Greeks and some Indians quietly re-enter the room, looking
far less naïve than they were taught to be. They
suspected that the cosmos was not inert. Not conscious, not personal—but active,
ordered, self-maintaining. They lacked the language of quanta and
recursion, so they spoke of logos, ṛta, nous. We
dismissed them as mystical. They were
pointing at this: The
cognizable universe is alive because it is the largest domain of successful
recurrence. A truly dead
universe would not be hostile to life. Death, finally demoted And
death? Death is
not a cosmic principle. It is a local failure. Stars die
when fusion loops collapse. There is
no absolute death—only procedures that stop working. The
universe does not mourn. It iterates. The conclusion nobody, save Finn, asked for Life is
not a miracle injected into matter. Randomness
is not the ground of being. And
humans? We are
not sparks of life in a dead cosmos. That is
not mysticism. From absolute deadness to life primitives Some ancients intuited that the Universe is alive The living Universe as executing Procedure |