The Living Universe as Executing Procedure

Recurrence, Randomness, and Life under Finn’s Procedure Monism

By Bodhangkur

Abstract

This essay integrates the results of Finn’s alternate non-anthropomorphic thought experiment on life—developed from absolute deadness, recurrence, and the unreality of ontological randomness—into the foundational framework of his Procedure Monism. It argues that life, properly defined, is not a biological anomaly but a structural consequence of procedural execution resisting erasure. Under Procedure Monism, the universe is not composed of substances or static being, but of discrete, quantised procedures whose successful recurrence generates identity, time, and cognizable reality. Life emerges not as an exception within a dead cosmos, but as the natural expression of a universe that is already minimally alive wherever procedure succeeds. Biological organisms, including humans, are shown to be high-order procedural knots: dense, self-referential recurrences executing the Universal Procedure under extreme constraint.

1. From substance to procedure: clearing the ontological ground

Finn’s Procedure Monism begins with a radical but disciplined move:

There are no substances, only procedures.

What classical metaphysics called “things” are, under this view, stable executions of constraint-bound processes. Identity is not given; it is achieved—and only temporarily—by repetition.

This already places Procedure Monism in direct continuity with the preceding thought experiment:

· Absolute deadness = no procedure executes twice

· Being = successful iteration

· Identity = recurrence under constraint

Where traditional ontology asked what is, Procedure Monism asks:

What continues to execute?

2. Absolute deadness reinterpreted: non-execution

Recall the starting point of the alternate thought experiment:

A space of random quanta, conceived as virtual events, with no recurrence. Nothing happens. It is dead.

In Procedure Monism terms, this can now be stated more precisely:

Absolute deadness is non-execution.

Events may occur, but no procedure stabilises. There is no rule-preserving iteration, no persistence, no identity. The Universal Procedure (UP), if it exists at all, fails locally to instantiate.

This is not “chaos” in the dramatic sense; it is procedural failure. Without recurrence, there is no time, because time itself is the counting of successful iterations.

Thus:

· Deadness ≠ absence of events

· Deadness = absence of executable continuity

3. The first success: recurrence as procedural ignition

The decisive transition in the thought experiment was this:

Two random quanta entangle, generating non-random recurrence, a self-logic bond, and a differential.

Procedure Monism names this exactly:

A procedure has begun to execute.

This is the ontological ignition point. Nothing mystical occurs. No substance appears. What appears is repeatability under constraint.

From the procedural standpoint:

· Entanglement = shared rule-set

· Recurrence = successful execution

· Differential = operational identity

This is the minimal unit (or quantum) of being under Procedure Monism:
a procedure that runs more than once.

And this is also the minimal unit of life, once life is stripped of biological decoration.

4. Life, redefined procedurally

From the foregoing experiment, life was defined as:

Persistent non-random recurrence resisting erasure.

Procedure Monism now sharpens this:

Life is a procedure that continues to execute by generating constraints that protect its own recurrence.

This definition:

· excludes anthropomorphism,

· excludes biology,

· excludes consciousness,

· excludes purpose.

It includes:

· atoms,

· fields,

· stars,

· organisms,

· cultures,

· technologies.

Life is not a property of a system.
Life is the fact that a system keeps happening.

5. Randomness under Procedure Monism: execution failure, not ontology

Finn’s alternate thought experiment concluded that ontological randomness is unreal: randomness is recurrence that fails too quickly to count as identity.

Procedure Monism reaches the same conclusion from the opposite direction:

Randomness is procedural non-commitment.

That is, the Universal Procedure explores state-space, but most exploratory executions fail to stabilise. These failures appear as:

· noise,

· randomness,

· virtual events,

· fluctuations.

But crucially:

Randomness is not a competing principle to order.
It is what unsuccessful procedure looks like.

A procedure that executes once and collapses leaves no trace.
A procedure that executes twice becomes real.

Thus, randomness is not the source of life.
Life is what remains when randomness stops winning.

6. Time as procedural depth

Earlier, time was identified as accumulated recurrence rather than a background container.

Procedure Monism formalises this elegantly:

Time is the depth of procedural execution.

· A photon has shallow time.

· An atom has deeper time.

· A molecule has deeper time still.

· A mammal has immense time.

· A culture or technology may exceed biological time.

There is no universal clock ticking independently.
There is only how far (i.e. how many times) a procedure has managed to run without crashing.

Life and time co-emerge as two names for the same fact.

7. Hydrogen revisited: alive, precisely defined

Return now to Finn’s original provocation: Is hydrogen alive or dead?

Under Procedure Monism:

· Hydrogen is a stable procedural solution

· It is a repeated execution of quantum constraints

· It maintains identity across perturbation

· It is vulnerable, hence temporal

· It can fail (ionise, fuse, annihilate)

Therefore:

Hydrogen is alive in the minimal procedural sense.

Not biologically alive.
Not conscious.
Not purposive.

But very much executing.

Calling hydrogen “dead” is a category error inherited from substance metaphysics.

8. Biological life as high-density procedure

Biological organisms now appear in proper proportion.

A human is:

· not a soul inhabiting matter,

· not a special substance,

· not an exception to physics,

but:

A massively recursive, self-referential, error-correcting procedural knot.

What distinguishes biological life is not life itself, but:

· feedback density,

· internal modelling,

· layered sub-procedures,

· affective signalling (pain/pleasure),

· accelerated iteration.

Under Procedure Monism, biology is procedure turned up to dangerous levels.

9. The cognizable universe as living execution

The earlier conclusion now integrates cleanly:

The cognizable universe is alive.

Why?

Because the cognizable universe is precisely the domain where procedures have succeeded.

· Stable laws = high-level procedural invariants

· Conserved quantities = constraint memory

· Particles = minimal recurring executions

· Structures = nested procedure stacks

A universe that were not alive in this sense would not merely be hostile to life — it would be unknowable, because nothing would persist long enough to be known.

Procedure Monism therefore rejects pan-deadism without lapsing into panpsychism.

The universe is alive because it executes.
Mind appears only where execution loops back on itself.

10. Death, finally demystified

Death, under this integrated view, is not metaphysical tragedy. It is:

Local procedural collapse.

· A human dies when biological procedures decohere.

· A star dies when fusion procedures fail.

· An atom “dies” when its constraints are broken.

Death is real, but never global.
The Universal Procedure continues.

There is no absolute death — only failure of particular runs.

11. Final summation

I can now state the unified conclusion without ambiguity:

1. Absolute deadness is non-execution.

2. Randomness is failed or insufficient recurrence.

3. Life is successful procedural persistence.

4. Time is depth of execution.

5. The cognizable universe is alive because it runs.

6. Humans are not exceptions, but dense knots of execution.

Or, stated in Finn’s idiom:

Reality is not a thing that exists, but a procedure that keeps working.
Life is not what appears within that procedure — life is what the procedure does when it does not fail.

This is not mysticism.
It is not metaphor.
It is the logical consequence of taking procedure, recurrence, and constraint seriously all the way down.

Absolute deadness: random quantum without recurrence

The ‘Bright’ Universe as weather

Claims about the ‘State’ of the Universe

The ancient Indians: Life emerges from death

Home