|
Adults as Corruptions of the Newborn State A Procedural-Monist
Argument, by Bodhangkur 1. Procedural Premise: Every emergent begins as a
maximally confined, self-consistent unit In Procedure
Monism, a newborn is the simplest possible operational emergent: ·
internal procedures (biological programs) ·
external conditions (caretaker, environment,
survival inputs) ·
and sensory flows are
tightly coupled. Such a
system has no spare degrees of freedom. In Finn’s
formulation: The perfect slave is free The newborn
is the purest instantiation of this principle. 2. The newborn state is procedurally perfect: no
contradiction, no residue, no borrowed instruction A newborn
executes only what it is procedurally structured to execute. ·
inherited moral codes ·
hierarchical self-model ·
symbolic conflicts ·
inner partitions ·
divided desires ·
guilt or shame ·
culturally injected teleologies It is a single-layer
interface, directly coupled to need. Example When a newborn
cries, the behaviour is not negotiated, repressed, justified, or symbolically
displaced. In
Procedure Monism terms: This is
the closest any human gets to procedural perfection. 3. Adultisation introduces
secondary procedures whose function is distortion The adult
state is produced by the layering of non-survival procedures: ·
language ·
social norms ·
guilt protocols ·
symbolic self-representations ·
aesthetic preferences ·
internalised punishments ·
imitation-signalling behaviour ·
future-projection loops ·
moral prohibitions ·
tribal identity scripts These are
not natural emergent necessities. They
introduce contradictions the newborn cannot generate: ·
“I want X but must not want it.” ·
“I feel Y but should feel Z.” ·
“I am this internally but must appear that
externally.” ·
“I desire pleasure but fear guilt.” These
contradictions produce friction, which in Procedure Monism is
equivalent to loss of functional freedom. Example A child
naturally expresses anger. 4. Adult cognition is built on predictive
hallucination: a deviation from real-time iteration In
Procedure Monism, survival occurs through real-time iteration in
response to immediate constraints. This is epistemically
impossible (the future is random), yet adults behave as if the future were
computable: ·
career planning ·
reputation management ·
fear of possible disapproval ·
self-sacrifice for hypothetical outcomes ·
anxiety based on imaginary scenarios These
“anticipatory procedures” distort present reality by forcing the emergent to
act based on non-existent inputs. Example An adult
avoids a pleasurable act now because it “might” be regretted later, or
“might” be judged. The
newborn suffers no such hallucination; it does not anticipate. 5. Adult selfhood is a composite fiction that
interferes with procedural clarity The
newborn has no “self,” only operation. ·
narratives ·
identities ·
roles ·
psychological storylines ·
metaphysical illusions of continuity These
artifices serve no survival function. In Finn’s
terms, identity becomes a self-referential feedback loop that hijacks
procedural bandwidth. Example An adult
refrains from acting because “that’s not who I am.” The
newborn has no such fiction; therefore its behaviour
is pristine. 6. The adult is a corruption because its constraints
conflict with its architecture Unlike
the newborn, whose constraints are intrinsic, the adult is shaped by external
constraints (culture, language, power structures) that do not map
smoothly onto biological architecture. This
produces: ·
repression ·
chronic contradictions ·
self-mistrust ·
dissonant signalling ·
emotional leakage ·
compulsive compensations ·
neurotic loops ·
physical illness (so Groddeck) In
procedural terms: The
newborn is structurally incapable of these corruptions. 7. Procedural Conclusion: Adults = corrupted emergences From the
above logic, the conclusion is necessary: 1. The newborn is a single-layer, fully integrated
procedural emergent. No borrowed
code, no contradiction. 2. The adult adds conflicting secondary layers. Scripts
that oppose primary constraints. 3. These layers produce internal division. Two or
more procedures compete for dominance. 4. Internal division = functional distortion. This is
corruption in the strictly procedural sense. 5. Therefore: All
adults are degraded derivatives of the newborn state. In Finn’s
language: Final Restatement In Procedure
Monism, the newborn represents maximal procedural coherence and minimal
contradiction. |