“It’s Not About Me”

The Natural Context of Quantised Emergence

 

1. Nature as Discontinuous Emergence

Nature does not unfold as a smooth, continuous fabric. Rather, it happens as a discontinuous series of quantised emergent events. Physics already hints at this: photons, electrons, and quarks appear and act in discrete packets, never as divisible halves. Each event is bounded, finite, and real in its moment of strike.

This discontinuity is not a flaw but a structural feature. It is the way in which realness comes to be. If reality were continuous, it would dissolve into the indefinite, never resolving into anything identifiable. Only by quantisation — by being cut into discrete packets — does nature generate identifiable existents.

 

2. The Human “Me” as Localised Quantum of Realness

The human individual, the familiar “me,” is precisely one such bounded packet. I am an identifiable, localised quantum of realness. My body and mind cohere into a recognisable emergent only because constraints — of biology, environment, and circumstance — hold me in place long enough to be experienced as a self.

In this sense, the human person is not exceptional. Just as a photon is a quantum of light-energy, so the human is a quantum of lived realness. Both exist only as bounded, discontinuous emergents.

 

3. The Individual as Probe

Yet the human self carries an additional function: it serves as an experimental probe of adaptation. Each person is a set of possibilities tested within the larger procedural system of nature. My thoughts, choices, and behaviours are not cosmic ends; they are trials, variations, experiments.

The lesson is stark: the individual is not an end in itself but a means by which the procedure tests survivability. Evolutionary history demonstrates this with unflinching clarity. Species appear, explore possibilities, and vanish if their adaptations fail. So too with individuals: we are probes that last a finite moment, then dissolve, leaving only the procedural iteration behind.

 

4. The Universal Procedure

The Universal Procedure — the druid Finn’s term for the underlying dynamic of existence — persists by self-iteration. It does not aim at perfection but at continuity. It seeks not to conserve identities but to extend itself through successive differential emergents.

This procedure operates both prior to and as each localised iteration. It is misleading to imagine a “whole” standing apart from its “parts.” The only reality is the procedure in act: the event of quantised emergence here, now. What we call “the whole” is merely the continuity of iteration across events.

 

5. What Is and Is Not About Me

From this perspective, we can draw a sharp distinction:

·         What is about me is only my identified moment of realness. In this bounded duration, I am unmistakably this one.

·         What is not about me is the ongoing procedural survival that passes through me but does not stop with me.

To confuse the two is the root of delusion. The cosmos is not centred on my persistence. I am centred only on my finite moment of realness.

 

6. Examples from Nature

·         Leaves on a tree: Each leaf is a bounded emergent. It draws in light, processes nutrients, and then falls. Its function is not self-permanence but contribution to the tree’s continuity. The leaf is real, but not central.

·         Neurons in a brain: A single neuron fires, connects, and dies. Its firing is real, but it serves the continuity of neural systems. The brain persists, not the individual neuron.

·         Civilisations: Human societies rise, experiment with forms of governance, technology, and culture, and then fade. Rome, Angkor, and the Maya existed as identifiable quanta of history. They were real, but their reality was bounded and transitional.

Each case confirms the same pattern: emergents are real in their bounded moment but are means, not ends, in the continuity of the procedure.

 

7. The Minim as Conclusion

Thus, the natural context of the druid Finn’s vision yields its logical minim:

“It’s not about me.”

Not because “me” is unreal or insignificant, but because “me” is a bounded experiment in survival, one of countless brief iterations through which the procedure continues.

 

8. Closing Reflection

This insight is sobering but liberating. To know that “it’s not about me” is to be freed from the illusion of cosmic centrality. It places the individual in proportion: not as the master of nature, but as one of its quantised expressions.

And yet, within my bounded realness, the experience is absolute. For the moment that I am, there is no other. That is the dignity of the emergent — but also its limit.

 

The Emergent as Probe

 

Home