| 
   The druid said: “He’s a more flexible blob” 1. The observational starting point: the slime mould as
  procedural exemplar In Finn’s
  worldview under Procedure Monism, every living being is a bounded
  iteration of the Universal Procedure (UP) — the one rule-set that continually organises random input into
  locally stable, self-organizing and self-regulating systems. In this
  schema: ·        
  The yellow slime mould (Physarum polycephalum),
  the
  blob, demonstrates
  pure procedural emergence: o  It is not
  segmented into permanent organs or individuals. o  It
  self-organises dynamically via chemical feedback and distributed
  computation. o  It solves
  problems (finding food, optimising paths) by trial, error, and feedback —
  random walk corrected by contact. In Finn’s
  language, the
  blob functions
  as living instance of the Universal Procedure with a minimal rule
  set: sensing, responding, reorganising. 2. Step one: general principle — life as adaptive blob Finn’s
  framework holds that all life forms are procedural blobs —
  transiently bounded flows of matter-energy organised by the UP. ·        
  Continuity of process: every
  living system maintains itself by continuous feedback, not by fixed form. ·        
  Flexibility: adaptive restructuring in
  response to contact events. ·        
  Distributed intelligence:
  problem-solving without a central metaphysical “soul.” The slime
  mould demonstrates that intelligence and order emerge from procedure alone,
  not from designed architecture. 3. Step two: evolution — increasing procedural
  complexity, not categorical difference As
  evolution proceeds, each new species (as biological platform) is not a
  metaphysical innovation but a further iteration of the same UP under
  tighter constraints and with richer internal feedback loops. ·        
  The mould computes chemically. ·        
  The worm computes neurally. ·        
  The human computes symbolically and socially. Each step
  is a procedural recursion that expands the range of possible
  contacts and adaptive responses. Hence,
  the human is still a blob — a coherent dynamic
  pattern of matter-energy — but one whose procedural flexibility has
  increased. 4. Step three: the human blob — more
  flexible, not less blobby From
  Finn’s vantage: ·        
  Form: The human body is no less a
  blob than the
  mould — 70% water, continuously metabolising, exchanging molecules with its
  environment. ·        
  Mind: The brain, as an evolved
  procedural network, is a slime mould in hyperdrive — electrochemical,
  self-organising, contact-reactive. ·        
  Society: Human civilisation is a meta-blob — vast
  distributed cognition, same algorithm on a larger canvas. Thus,
  when Finn remarks, “He’s a more flexible blob,” he simply
  states that Homo sapiens represents an upgraded iteration of
  the same universal blobbic
  algorithm — more elastic, symbolically recursive, but
  fundamentally identical in kind. 5. Step four: logical progression of the argument 1.     Premise
  A: The slime mould demonstrates that self-organisation,
  perception, and adaptation can occur without fixed boundaries or central
  control — i.e. a blob can
  think. 2.     Premise
  B: Evolution increases local flexibility of the same
  procedural capacity (the UP). 3.     Premise
  C: The human is not metaphysically distinct but
  procedurally continuous with the slime mould. 4.     Conclusion: The
  human is a more flexible blob — not an exception to nature but an advanced
  expression of it. Thus, the
  minim follows by strict continuity of procedure, not by analogy. 6. Step five: interpretive commentary — the druid’s
  irony Finn’s
  minim, like most of his “Minims,” carries both scientific precision
  and druidic mockery: ·        
  Mockery: it undercuts the human
  pretence to transcendence — the metaphysical inflation, indeed hubris that
  imagines and then projects “man” as “image of God.” ·        
  Precision: it locates intelligence,
  creativity, and even self-consciousness squarely within the natural
  procedural continuum, not outside it. ·        
  Moral: to call man a “more flexible blob” is to
  restore ontological humility: one is a better problem-solving patch
  of the same universal slime. 7. Step six: relation to Procedure Monism and Realness In the Procedure
  Monism model: ·        
  Realness arises at contact events
  — quantised exchanges of information or energy that, happening serially,
  stabilise identity. ·        
  The slime mould’s contacts are chemical; the human’s include symbolic, conceptual, emotional, and
  technological. ·        
  Therefore, humans achieve greater density of
  contact-events, hence greater degrees of realness, but the
  underlying logic remains that of the blob. Humanness
  = high-frequency slime moulding. 8. Step seven: the metaphysical context — from slime to
  soul The minim
  thus closes the evolutionary loop between biology and metaphysics: 
 The druid
  recognises himself as the blob that knows it is a blob, and thus
  achieves moksha — release from the lie of being something else. 9. Final synthesis The
  natural context of the minim is the continuity of the procedural life-form,
  from slime to sapiens. 1.     All
  beings are self-organising blobs of procedure. 2.     Evolution
  = increased flexibility of blobbic response. 3.     The
  human, as a high-resolution slime mould, is a blob that can
  talk about blobs. 4.     Hence,
  consciousness is the blob becoming
  aware of its own procedural blobbiness. Therefore: The human
  is not a transcendental subject but the universe’s most articulate blob —  |