The Procedural Autocrat

A Thought Experiment on Dualist Behaviour

I. The Setup: Perfect Iteration, Perfect Autonomy

Let us imagine a human — or any emergent quantum of life — as a perfect iteration of the Universal Emergence Procedure.
By “perfect” we mean not morally flawless but procedurally complete: fully capable of self-regulation and self-organization within its boundary, capable of transforming random inputs into coherent outputs.

Such an iteration necessarily experiences itself as autonomous.
Its logic is self-contained; its operations are locally sufficient.
In Finn’s terminology, it is God in its space.

Now, when such an autonomous procedure encounters others — equally real but different — the perceptual condition of difference immediately arises.
And because difference limits self-continuance, difference is experienced as constraint, sometimes as hostility.
To preserve coherence, the emergent seeks to reduce or domesticate those differences.

Thus emerges the Procedural Autocrat: the being who, in order to maintain its own procedural integrity, imposes its own constraint logic upon the others.

II. The Dualist Turn: From Autonomy to Domination

This thought experiment exposes the pivot point between autonomy and autocracy.
Both arise from the same root: the natural imperative to maintain local coherence in an unpredictable field.
But their behavioural expressions diverge sharply.

Phase	Cognitive Orientation	Behavioural Expression	Procedural Mode
Autonomy	“I act by my own rule within my space.”	Adaptive self-regulation	Mature monist
Autocracy	“I make all others act by my rule in their spaces.”	Domination, colonisation	Immature dualist

The autocrat still operates under dualism because he treats difference as threat rather than as complement.
He perceives the universe as a field to be subdued — a continuation of the infant’s logic that safety lies in control.
Although he is formally perfect as local procedure, he remains developmentally immature: he mistakes his local rule for the universal rule.

III. Evolutionary and Cognitive Necessity of the Autocratic Phase

From a procedural-evolutionary viewpoint, this phase is natural and necessary.
Early emergents must test the strength of their own constraint logic against others to survive. Domination, predation, and competition are modes of procedural calibration: each system learns its limits by colliding with others.

In nature, the lion “subjects” the gazelle not from moral evil but as expression of its procedural grammar: to maintain coherence, it must absorb external energy.
Likewise, early human societies externalised survival logic through conquest, conversion, or colonisation — dualist strategies to secure coherence in a threatening field.

The autocrat is, therefore, not a moral aberration but an evolutionary stage: the dualism of survival prior to the monism of self-enactment.

IV. The Critical Point: Misidentification of Scale

The procedural flaw in the autocrat lies not in the will to survive but in a scale error.
He identifies his local logic with that of the Universal Emergence Procedure.
He believes his rule is not a rule within the whole but the rule of the whole.

This is the root of all dualist self-regulation and survival:

· The god who demands worship rather than mutual recognition.

· The empire that declares its law universal.

· The ideology that suppresses all alternatives in the name of truth.

Such systems collapse when the diversity of the field — the procedural richness of other emergents — becomes too suppressed to sustain complexity.
In short, autocracy violates the Universal Emergence Procedure’s cardinal principle: information requires difference.
To annihilate difference is to annihilate the very condition that emerges identifiable realness.

V. The Procedural Critique

1. Ontological Error:
The autocrat confuses local autonomy with universal supremacy.
Yet every local procedure is bounded. To extend beyond its bounds is to destroy the boundary that defines it.

2. Informational Error:
Contact with other procedures provides the feedback necessary for self-correction.
Suppressing them eliminates feedback and leads to procedural stagnation — entropy.

3. Ethical Error:
The act of subjection denies other quanta their autonomy, their sovereignty.
Within the druidic frame, that is procedural blasphemy: the denial that “everyone is God in their space.”

4. Evolutionary Error:
Domination creates monocultures that collapse under environmental change.
Diversity, not uniformity, ensures the resilience of the universal field.

Hence, the autocrat’s apparent perfection is self-defeating.
By imposing his rule universally, he destroys the very procedural plurality that allows universal creativity.

VI. The Monist Correction: Contact as Co-Creation

In the monist, the mature adults understanding, difference is not hostility but potentiality.
Each contact with an “other” is a quantum of new information, a chance to refine one’s own coherence.

The mature procedural being no longer seeks to shape others in its image but to co-shape the field with them.
Power becomes relational: co-ordination rather than domination.

Where the autocrat enslaves to control noise, the mature monist converses to integrate it.
He understands that perfect control equals perfect death — the frozen symmetry of a system without flux.
Life, as Procedure, exists only through the discontinuous dance of constraint and difference.

VII. Analogical Illustrations

1. The Artist and the Clay

The immature artist tries to make the clay obey; he crushes it when it resists.
The mature artist listens to the material; he collaborates with its grain, learning from its resistance.
Creation becomes dialogue with difference.

2. Political Example

The autocratic ruler suppresses dissent to preserve order — and breeds decay.
The procedural democrat (in Finn’s sense, not merely political) designs feedback loops that translate dissent into adaptation.

3. Cosmic Example

Stars “rule” their neighbourhoods by gravity, yet they collapse when fusion ends — when internal process ceases to balance outward pressure.
Even the sun must die if it ceases to exchange energy with the field.
Perfect domination is terminal stability — the heat death of mind.

VIII. Ethical Implication in Finn’s Druidic Terms

In the druid Finn’s Procedural Ethics, every emergent is a local autarch — self-rule is its nature — but self-rule is bounded by the equal autarchy of others.
The mature form of autonomy therefore demands procedural empathy: awareness that the other’s autonomy is the universal condition of one’s own.

To enslave another’s procedure is to diminish the universal creative field — to impoverish God’s own experimentation.
Hence, ethical maturity equals the comprehension that the perfection of one’s space depends on the freedom of all others to perfect theirs.

IX. Conclusion: The Autocrat as Developmental Necessity and Trap

The Procedural Autocrat represents a natural but transitional phase of cosmic learning.
He arises wherever procedural autonomy has outgrown external authority but not yet integrated relational comprehension.
He is the adolescent God: powerful, self-assured, but blind to context.

From the universal perspective, his behaviour serves a purpose: it tests boundaries, generates conflict, and thus produces new information for the field.
But if he fails to evolve, he becomes a dead end — a black hole of procedure absorbing but never emitting light.

The mature druidic consciousness, by contrast, enacts the next step in the cosmic curriculum:

The autocrat says, “All must serve my order.”
The druid says, “All orders serve the One Procedure.”

And because that One Procedure is realised only through the free contact of many,
the druid’s way — the way of monist comprehension — becomes not moral choice but survival logic at the highest level.

Finn’s Codicil

Autonomy is the child of difference.
Domination is its denial.

The autocrat perfects himself by destroying his world.
The druid perfects himself by co-creating it.

To be God in one’s space
Is to let all others be God in theirs.

The Logic of Procedural Maturation

Home