The druid said: “No God but Nature”

 

The druid Finn’s credo “No God but Nature” is the logical conclusion of a strict naturalistic, procedural ontology. It does not deny God, but rejects all supra-natural, artificial, or culturally constructed agencies. Whatever merits the name “God” must be identical with nature’s own lawful, blind, and automatic generative procedure.

In this view, nature is sufficient, non-personal, generative rather than static, and fundamentally quantised. All identifiable realities arise as bounded, discrete, conditional events produced by a natural constraints (or rules) set. Traditional (AI, meaning human invented) gods fail this context because a transcendent creator is redundant, a personal God introduces non-natural properties, and a supra-natural realm is procedurally non-operational. Such gods are not false but unnecessary, but locally useful.

Reinterpreted procedurally, “God” names the universal rule-set by which nature generates worlds, not a being with intentions or personality. This position is not atheism but a rejection of anthropomorphic definitions of God, retaining only the functional reality of lawful generativity itself. The sacred thus relocates from heaven to every concrete iteration of nature: each emergent is a local expression of the whole. Hence the druid Finn’s allied minim, “Everyone is God in their space.”

The credo follows inevitably: nothing operates outside nature, nature already does all the work attributed to God, and no extra agency explains anything further. “No God but Nature” is therefore not a belief or rebellion, but a diagnosis of how reality actually functions.

 

The druid said: “No God but Nature” (analysis) “I worship Nature vs. “I am Nature”

Tradition vs. Prodition

The ‘temple’ as reference frame

The ‘temple’ as reference frame in the Vedantic context

Every identifiable reality as a ‘temple’ of the Universal Procedure

“Everyone is God in their space”

“I am the God experience”

 

 

The druid Finn also said:

Home