“The best live better”

The Druid’s Ontology of the ‘Best’ in a Conditional, Unpredictable Cosmos

I. Prelude: On the Nature of Continuance

In a cosmos without certainties, free from fixed origin or evident purpose, there arises a peculiar kind of being — finite, emergent, and sentient. Such a being, call it a quantum of nature, knows neither where it came from nor where it is going. What it does know, however imperfectly, is that it exists, it changes, and it must act in order to continue.

Continuance is not a right, nor a gift, but a conditional phenomenon. There is no final victory — only recurrence. And in this dynamic, adaptation is the language of persistence.

The druid Finn here explores the ontological mechanics by which natural beings — finite and original — orient themselves toward continuance. He proposes a model in which “best” is not a hierarchical or comparative state, but an internal computation of successful adaptation relative to an arbitrary goal. This goal, self-generated, channels will into meaningful work — the cost of persistence in a system ruled by entropy and unpredictability.

II. Foundations of the Ontology

1. Conditionality and the Absence of Ground

Every being arises within a mesh of fluctuating conditions (so already the Buddha, 450BC) There is no absolute frame; there are only momentarily coherent systems. A star, a bird, a thought — all emerge, persist, and dissolve within change.

From this, the cosmos cannot promise continuance to any part. It can only offer the chance to participate — moment by moment — through adaptation.

2. The Quantum of Nature

A quantum of nature is defined as any discrete, emergent configuration of matter and energy capable of modifying itself in response to conditional pressure. This includes not just living beings but adaptive systems writ large — from molecules to markets, from ecosystems, whole cultures to neural loops.

Each quantum is:

· Original (no repetition)

· Finite (bounded in time and space)

· Unpredictable (not fully computable even by its own components)

Example: No two trees, though similar in species and genetics, are ever the same. Each bends in its own wind, grows in its own soil, suffers its own scars — and adapts uniquely. Each is a quantum of natural difference.

3. Orientation through Arbitrary Goal

Given the lack of inherent purpose, each quantum must generate a local orientation. This takes the form of an arbitrary goal — not arbitrary in function, but arbitrary in origin. It is not handed down. It is posited.

This goal focuses the quantum’s adaptive machinery — attention, energy, time — into something that gives structure to its existence.

Example: A human child decides to build a tower of stones by the river. This action has no cosmic significance. Yet in the act of arranging those stones, she adapts to balance, gravity, wetness, instability. She learns, she persists, and she grows. That goal, in context, was not meaningless — it was a vector of transformation.

4. Adaptation and Work

All movement toward a goal in a conditional system requires work — the directed expenditure of energy against resistance. In this framework, work is the price of participation.

Adaptation is not success, but process. It is iterative, effortful, and necessarily responsive. Every act of adaptation signals that a being is trying to continue.

Example: A startup company seeks to build a new solar panel. The goal is self-imposed. The engineers iterate — failing, adjusting, learning. Every pivot is adaptation. Every hour spent is work. Some succeed. Some dissolve. But the process itself reflects the structure of continuance.

III. The Internal Computation of “Best”

Here lies the ontological heart of the druid’s perspective.

When a quantum experiences successful adaptation relative to its chosen goal — and this adaptation enhances the probability of its continuance — it internally registers this outcome as “best.”

This is not pride, or social ranking. It is a computational result:

“I tried something. I adapted. I did not fail. I continue.”

This state — let us call it local optimization — is felt as clarity, relief, flow, or fulfilment, enlightenment. It is a structural echo of survival — but not merely biological survival. It is the subjective sense of coherence in the act of becoming.

Example: An elderly woman tends a small garden on her balcony. She chooses the arrangement. She adjusts to sunlight and weather. Her reward is not global recognition. Her “best” is the daily felt alignment between her attention and what endures. The flower persists. So does she, happily.

IV. From Individual to Aggregate: Systemic Continuance

Since every quantum in the cosmos is potentially capable of generating its own “best” through goal-driven adaptation, and since this “best” improves its local chance of continuance, then it follows:

A cosmos that supports the widest distribution of goal-making and adaptive opportunity increases its aggregate probability of continuance.

This is not idealism. It is systems logic.

Example: In an ecosystem, biodiversity is not ornamental. It is resilience. Each species — insect, fungus, predator — has its own adaptation to a local goal: survival, reproduction, niche optimization. The greater the spread of these local “bests,” the more likely the whole ecosystem survives disturbance.

In the druid’s framing, “The best live better” is not a moral judgment or elitist structure. It is an observation of distributed success: those beings who achieve local alignment with continuance tend to persist. And because any being can do this — through effort, within its own domain — “best” becomes universal and democratic.

V. Rewriting the Paradox

Earlier theories have separated fitness from fulfilment, creating a paradox: one may be evolutionarily successful yet existentially empty.

This ontology resolves that paradox:

· Fulfilment is not optional; it is the subjective signal of a successful adaptation.

· Adaptation is not for optimization, but for continuance.

· Continuance is not guaranteed, but probabilistic — and each local “best” improves the odds.

Thus, trying — even blindly — becomes sacred. The act of trying is itself the engine of reality.

Example: A poet in exile writes verses no one will read. The poems help her survive grief, dislocation, erasure. She adapts to meaninglessness by creating meaning. She continues. In that act, she is best.

VI. Principles for Practice

Let this framework inform how human quanta build, organize, and imagine:

1. Maximize Adaptive Freedom
The design systems (political, social, ecological) that allow beings to generate their own goals and pursue them without systemic inhibition.

2. Honor Arbitrary Goals
They do not demand that goals be “justified” in external terms. If they support adaptation, they are valid.

3. Support Work, Not Outcome
They invest in the capacity for effort — the time, energy, space, and safety required for beings to attempt continuance.

4. Redefine Value as Distributed “Best”
The wealth of a system lies in how many of its quanta are able to register “best” internally — not in how few accumulate status.

VII. Conclusion: The Best as Cosmic Engine

In the end, we are each a flicker — a contingent pattern. But we can strive, adapt, and try. And when our effort yields a moment of stability, of coherence, of forward motion — that is our “best.”

It is not given. It is made.

And when more beings make it — each in their own way — the cosmos learns how to last.

VIII. Epilogue: A Final Example

A bacterium mutates. A wolf changes hunting ground. A parent learns to apologize. A dancer rebalances after a fall. A mind reframes failure as experiment. A gal generates an orgasm. A dream comes true. A human acts as probe. Each of these is the same event: a system adapting toward continuance.

None of them know what the future holds. But in that moment — in the trying — they are best.

And the cosmos, in that trying, continues.

Home