The Minimally Cognizable Indivisible Particle As proposed by the Druid, Finn 1. Historical Background ·
Ancient Atomism: Philosophers such as
Democritus (and Mahavira) proposed that there must be a smallest indivisible
unit (“atomos,” meaning uncuttable) beyond which
division is impossible. ·
Modern Physics: Successive discoveries
showed that what physicists wrongly called “atoms”, and which were in fact
chemical elements, were divisible: o Rutherford
split the atom (an element) into nucleus and electrons. o Chadwick
identified the neutron. o Quarks
were proposed as constituents of protons and neutrons. ·
Interpretive Slippage: The
label “atom” drifted from “indivisible” to “smallest piece of matter known at
the time.” Observation: What
was split was never truly an “atom” in the ancient scientific, now reframed
as philosophical sense—only provisional models of matter. 2. The Role of Measurement and Cognition ·
Quantum Mechanics: Any
detection of a photon involves an interaction (e.g., absorption by a
photodetector), which is a discrete event. ·
Observer-Coupling: This
event is not simply “passive” observation. The observer’s measuring
apparatus + the photon together instantiate a
single, irreducible occurrence: a “click” or count. ·
Information Theory: The
outcome of measurement has finite information. It is binary (yes/no) or
quantized (energy levels). Key Claim: The event
of observation generates a minimal, indivisible quantum of cognition—what
the Druid calls a minim particle, meaning absolutely
smallest object. 3. Argument for Indivisibility Premise
1: Any act of measurement requires a minimal interaction
(e.g., photon absorbed → electron excited → detection). 4. Example: Photon Detection Consider
a single-photon detector (avalanche photodiode). Scenario: ·
A photon of wavelength 500 nm strikes the
detector. ·
If the photon is absorbed, the detector “clicks.” ·
This click corresponds to the transfer of a
discrete quantum of energy and yields a single, countable event. Analysis: ·
You cannot subdivide the click into
further observational sub-events. ·
Even if the energy is eventually dispersed in the
detector, the measurement outcome (photon detected) is not further
decomposable. ·
This is the minimal cognizable interaction. 5. Related Scientific and Philosophical Work While no
scientist or mathematician has described this in exactly the druid’s
terminology (“minim particle”), related ideas appear in: John
Archibald Wheeler’s “It from Bit” Reality
arises from discrete yes/no questions (bits) posed by observers. Quantum
Information Theory Measurement
outcomes are quantized information. Quantum
Event Ontology Some
physicists (e.g., Carlo Rovelli) argue that events (interactions) are primary
rather than particles or fields. Phenomenology
of Perception The
smallest discernible experience is an indivisible act of awareness. However,
nobody has split the minimal observation event in the sense that not
just the druid but the ancient Greeks and Indians
meant. In fact, no known experiment can subdivide a single detection into
smaller detection events without destroying its singularity. 6. Objections and Clarifications ·
Objection: What about partial
absorption or weak measurements? o Response: Weak
measurement yields partial information but is conceptually a different
process. The minimally cognizable outcome is still quantized. ·
Objection: Can entanglement show
substructure? o Response:
Entanglement affects correlations between events, not the singularity
of each detection itself. 7. Implication If this
argument holds, then: ·
The ancient notion of the atom as the smallest
un-splitable entity survives—only now reframed. ·
It is not a “thing” in space but a discrete,
irreducible event: the conditional response of an observer to a photon
strike. Summary of the Argument Thesis: The
smallest indivisible object is the minimally cognizable detection event—the “minim particle.” ·
All observation is fundamentally quantized. ·
The outcome cannot be further split into
observational sub-events. ·
No experiment has ever split such an event. |