Enlightenment as a
Sub-Function in Nature Systems Theory (NST) A Universal Energetic
Signature of Constraint Resolution I. Overview Nature
Systems Theory (NST) provides a framework for understanding how adaptive
systems—whether biological, cognitive, artificial, or ecological—detect,
respond to, and evolve through constraints. Within this framework, we
define enlightenment as a sub-function: the energetic
after-effect that arises when a constraint is successfully resolved. This
updated model incorporates the dual sources of resolution (internal
and external), the spectrum of energy release (sudden vs.
gradual), and critically, the agnostic nature of the enlightenment
experience—it signals breakthrough to reconfiguration, not truth,
usefulness, or ethical value. II. Revised Definition of Enlightenment Enlightenment
is the energetic and affective after-effect experienced by a system when a
constraint to its coherence or survival is eliminated, regardless of whether
the resolution is internally generated or externally introduced. Key Features: ·
May involve sudden or gradual release of
energy ·
May or may not include affective states (joy,
clarity, peace) ·
Is a system-level event, not a moral or
epistemic endorsement ·
Represents a breakthrough, not a verdict III. Dual Sources of Constraint Resolution
Both
pathways result in the same core process: IV. Energy Release Dynamics: Sudden vs. Gradual Sudden Release ·
Characterized by a sharp energetic surge ·
May radically reconfigure the system (cognition,
metabolism, behaviour) ·
Subjectively felt as breakthrough, epiphany,
or transcendence with or without reconfigured perspective ·
Especially common when: o Constraint
is deep-rooted o High
concentration or pressure, indeed, mental speed, is sustained o Resolution
is internally derived Gradual Release ·
Constraint is resolved incrementally ·
Enlightenment effect is subtle, unfolding
over time ·
Seen in slow learning, healing, or long-term
integration ·
The energy reconfigures the system more stably
but less dramatically V. Distinction: Enlightenment vs. Application Enlightenment
is triggered by constraint resolution—not by the application or outcome, for instance a reconfigured perspective, of the
released energy. This
distinction is critical: ·
Enlightenment marks a shift, not its
interpretation or utility. ·
A system may feel liberated without the new state
being adaptive, truthful, or even stable. ·
Conversely, useful transformations may occur
without emotional intensity or perceived “awakening.” This
means that enlightenment is an affective and energetic signal—not
an epistemological claim, moral reward, or measure of success. VI. Clarifying Misconceptions about Enlightenment
VII. Use Cases Across Systems
VIII. Conclusion: Enlightenment as Breakthrough, Not
Verdict Enlightenment
(like orgasm, indeed,
any catharsis) in the NST framework, is not a goal, reward, or state of
truth. It is a natural systemic event—a release of constrained
energy that signals successful constraint resolution that prepares for adaptation.
It can emerge from inside or outside, be gradual or sudden, and
lead to useful or neutral or even harmful consequences. Enlightenment
is an energy flash, not an emobied fact. By
situating enlightenment within a neutral, energetic systems model, we
gain a powerful tool for understanding why it happens, how it
spreads, and what it means across biology, cognition, technology,
and culture. Adapted for the spiritual path Campbell’s Hero vs. the Druid’s NST |