| 
   From Dualism via Non-Dualism to Monism by the Druid Finn 1. Framing the Inquiry Human
  conceptions of “God” and reality have shifted across time and cultures,
  oscillating between dualist, non-dualist, and monist perspectives.
  Rather than seeing these as competing metaphysical doctrines, we can
  reinterpret them as developmental survival supports—analogous to
  phases of human maturation. ·        
  God is here defined not as a supernatural
  agent but as the Universal Procedure: the generative rule-set (like a Universal Turing Machine) from which all
  identifiable realities emerge. ·        
  Man is a local, finite iteration
  of this Universal Procedure, a temporary event expressing the rules within
  specific constraints. Thus, the
  three worldviews are expedient fictions that scaffold the maturing
  capacity of human self-regulation: ·        
  Dualism (infantile stage) →
  external dependence. ·        
  Non-dualism (juvenile stage) →
  transitional self-regulation. ·        
  Monism (adult stage) → full
  procedural autonomy. 2. Phase One: Dualism – The Infantile Stage Definition: God and
  man are absolutely separate; God regulates man from
  the outside. ·        
  This is the infantile stage of survival training.
  The child depends entirely on external regulation—parents who feed, protect,
  and punish. In cultural terms, God-as-external-father provides the
  same function. ·        
  Early religions embody this: a commanding deity
  who rewards obedience and punishes disobedience. The external order is
  necessary because the infantile self cannot yet self-regulate. ·        
  Example: The Mosaic commandments function like
  parental rules: “Do not steal. Do not kill.” These prohibitions create
  predictable social order. Developmental
  benefit: ·        
  Provides security and predictability. ·        
  Instills
  obedience to rules before reasoning capacity matures. Toxic
  effect when imposed outside its phase: ·        
  For adolescents or adults, enforced dualism
  infantilizes. ·        
  It prevents self-regulation, producing guilt,
  fear, or blind conformity. ·        
  Historical example: Theocratic systems punishing
  free thought, thereby crippling cultural creativity. 3. Phase Two: Non-Dualism – The Juvenile Stage Definition: God is
  both outside and within; man carries God internally but still refers to a
  higher order. ·        
  As the child grows into adolescence, the parent’s
  voice is internalized as conscience or reason. External authority fades into internalized
  guidance. ·        
  Non-dualist philosophies—Upanishadic “Thou art
  That,” Christian mysticism, or Sufi poetry—mirror this stage. The divine is
  no longer remote but recognized as present within. ·        
  Example: Augustine’s dictum “God is closer to me
  than I am to myself.” Developmental
  benefit: ·        
  Trains the capacity for self-regulation while
  retaining transitional support. ·        
  Allows experimentation, responsibility, and
  creativity under the assurance of an internal compass. Toxic
  effect when imposed outside its phase: ·        
  For infants, non-dualism is incomprehensible;
  they need simple external rules, not subtle mystical metaphors. ·        
  For mature adults, clinging to a God-within model
  prevents recognition of full autonomy. It sustains dependency disguised as
  depth. ·        
  Example: Late scholastic mysticism collapsing
  into quietism, where individuals abdicate
  responsibility by “surrendering” to the divine within. 4. Phase Three: Monism – The Adult Stage Definition: Man is
  God; there is no distinction. Every “I AM” is a direct iteration of the
  Universal Procedure. ·        
  The adult no longer requires parental
  supervision, whether external or internalized. The rules of life are embodied
  and enacted directly. ·        
  In monism, the Universal Procedure is not “out
  there” or “in here.” It is identical with the event of existence itself. The
  individual recognizes: my being is already the expression of the universal
  law. ·        
  Example: Spinoza’s Deus sive
  Natura (“God or Nature”), or the Buddhist notion that “nirvana is samsara”
  once ignorance is transcended. Developmental
  benefit: ·        
  Provides the fullest autonomy. ·        
  Ends projection of authority, grounding survival
  in direct recognition of self as universal event. ·        
  Supports creativity, maturity, and ethical action
  without external compulsion. Toxic
  effect when imposed outside its phase: ·        
  For infants, the idea “you are God” is
  destructive, removing necessary external order. ·        
  For adolescents, it tempts premature arrogance,
  confusing partial self-regulation with total autonomy (“spiritual bypassing,”
  megalomania, or cult leadership). ·        
  Example: Gnostic sects or modern gurus
  proclaiming divinity without the psychological maturity to embody procedural
  responsibility. 5. The Evolutionary Function of the Three Phases The three
  systems are not competing metaphysical truths but developmental expedients,
  each valid only within its phase: ·        
  Dualism → necessary
  discipline for the immature. ·        
  Non-dualism → transitional
  training for growing autonomy. ·        
  Monism → final recognition
  of procedural identity. Each
  becomes toxic when misapplied: ·        
  Dualism infantilizes adults. ·        
  Non-dualism confuses infants and hinders
  maturity. ·        
  Monism, if premature, produces delusion rather
  than autonomy. Thus, the
  health of individuals and cultures depends on correctly staging these
  worldviews. 6. Implications for Philosophy and Religion This
  developmental lens explains why religious and philosophical systems have
  often clashed: each assumes universality for what is in fact a phase-specific
  expedient. ·        
  The dualist theologian condemns the monist as
  heretical. ·        
  The non-dualist mystic accuses the dualist of
  superficiality. ·        
  The monist dismisses both as childish. But in reality, each speaks
  to a different developmental need. 7. Conclusion: Toward Procedural Maturity If God is
  the Universal Procedure, then every life is its local iteration. To mature is
  to recognize this progressively: 1.     First, as
  dependence on external law (dualism). 2.     Then, as
  internalization of divine regulation (non-dualism). 3.     Finally,
  as direct embodiment of the Universal Procedure (monism). Each
  stage is necessary; each is temporary. To mistake a temporary scaffolding for
  ultimate truth is to arrest development. To move through them in order is to
  mature into self-regulating autonomy—the recognition that man is
  God, as event of the Universal Procedure. From
  regulated continuity to discontinuous self-regulation The Logic of Procedural
  Maturation  |