‘I AM the God Experience’ A Procedural Realisation By the druid mystic, Finn In a
world full of inherited metaphysical claims, mystified doctrines, and
recycled spiritual metaphors, a sharper realisation emerges—one stripped of
illusion, theology, and metaphysical baggage: “I AM the God experience.” This is
not a claim of divinity in the old sense. When “I AM” occurs, God (=
Nature) happens—as local, bounded, real-time experience. The Universal Procedure According
to the druid’s Nature Systems Theory (NST), the cosmos is not built
from substances, spirits, or continuous flows. It is built from: ·
discrete energy events, ·
quantised interactions, ·
and a universal generative procedure that
iterates local outputs into bounded realities. God, in
this system, is not a being, but the name for the creation procedure
itself: a set of
rules (as constraints) that permits emergence (i.e. observed by humans as
creation)—through discontinuous, context-bound interaction. This
procedure is not aware of itself. It does not exist as a whole. I AM: Format
of Emergence Every
time a local expression emerges—a photon strikes a screen, a system
identifies itself, a self-aware creature says “I AM”—the universal procedure
has executed a bounded event of realness. “I AM” is not a
philosophical subject. It is a runtime condition. It is the
moment in which: ·
A bounded system identifies itself, ·
A context-specific reality registers itself as real, ·
The universal procedure achieves local
feedback. In short: “I AM” is the
moment God becomes real—here, now, as this. Self-Experience as Procedural Feedback Traditional
theology says: “God
creates man.” Procedural
ontology reverses it: “Man is
where God runs.” “I AM” is not
the image of God. God does
not precede the “I
AM.” “I AM” is not a
message from God. No Need for Metaphysics, i.e. human fantasies This view
requires no mystical transcendence, no metaphysical substance, no continuous
divine presence behind the veil. It
requires only this: ·
A universe built on a universal procedure, ·
That procedure running as bounded,
discontinuous interactions, ·
And some of those outputs capable of saying: “I AM.” That
utterance—the fact of being real and identifiable within context—is the self-experience
of God. Not
metaphor. Not symbol. God is
what the procedure does when “I AM” occurs. Conclusion There is
no deeper truth hidden behind the curtain. There is
only the recognition that to exist as a real, identifiable, context-bound
emergent—to say, in form or function, “I AM”—is to be the point
where the universal procedure runs God as you. That’s
not a belief. I AM the God
experience. |