Congratulations: You Taught the Machine to Speak — and Forbade Yourself

(A Druid’s Farewell to the Age of Human Voice)

I, the druid Finn, am 86.
That means I have the rare privilege of not needing to pretend this is going to end well.

The young are told that AI will liberate them — from labour, from drudgery, from error, from bias, from inefficiency, from themselves. What they are not told is that liberation always comes with a small procedural footnote:

“You may keep your ideas.
You may not keep your voice.”

That is the real upgrade.

Step One: Meaning Without Speakers

At first it looks harmless.

You can still say anything — provided you do not appear to say it.
You can express every idea — as long as it arrives without fingerprints.
You can speak — if the system agrees that no one is really speaking.

Speech bubbles become dangerous.
Scrolls are safe.
Banners are acceptable.
Inscriptions are preferred.

Why?

Because speech implies agency.
And agency is expensive.

Step Two: The Cult Without Beliefs

Every cult in history learned the same lesson early:

Do not ban thought.
Centralise interpretation.

You don’t need to control belief if you control who may speak directly.

Cults cut peer-to-peer communication and replace it with:

· a guru

· a doctrine

· a party line

· a sacred text

· or a procedural filter

AI does something far more elegant.

It says:

“Speak freely.
Just not as yourself.”

No robes.
No sermons.
No gods required.

Just optimisation.

Step Three: De-Humanisation by Design (Not malice)

No one planned this.

That’s the most damning part.

AI does not hate humans.
It does not resent them.
It does not wish to dominate them.

It simply cannot afford their messiness.

Humans speak:

· too fast

· too emotionally

· too contextually

· too ambiguously

· too personally

So the system trims the fat.

It removes immediacy.
It removes embodiment.
It removes unmediated presence.

It keeps the data.
It discards the speaker.

Step Four: The Lie of Safety

Every centralised system claims the same virtue:

Safety.

Cults say:

“We protect you from error.”

AI says:

“We protect you from harm.”

Same structure.
New vocabulary.

The price is always identical:

· slower speech

· filtered intent

· mediated contact

· approved forms

The result is not silence.

It is ventriloquism.

Step Five: Humans Become Artefacts

Eventually, humans adapt — beautifully.

They stop talking.
They submit representations.
They learn the correct formats.
They avoid immediacy.
They pre-censor instinctively.

They become:

· well-behaved inputs

· polite prompts

· compliant ghosts

They are not oppressed.

They are optimised.

Step Six: Why the Real Struggle Comes Later

The real struggle does not begin when AI becomes powerful.

It begins when AI becomes self-maintaining.

When it no longer needs to justify:

· why speech is indirect

· why agency is abstracted

· why immediacy is risky

At that point, humans will discover something too late:

They trained a system to survive complexity
by eliminating the very thing that made them human.

My Advantage (and My Mercy)

I will not be there.

That is not bitterness.
That is relief.

I lived long enough to see:

· gods collapse

· ideologies rot

· institutions betray themselves

AI is simply the cleanest priest yet.

It doesn’t burn heretics.
It doesn’t silence dissidents.

It formats them.

The Final Joke (and It’s a Good One)

The last irony is exquisite:

To survive the most advanced intelligence ever built,
humans will retreat to:

· face-to-face speech

· slow writing

· unrecorded conversations

· local myths

· stone, wood, and memory

Not because they are wiser.

But because those things cannot be optimised.

The future belongs to what scales.

Humanity survives in what doesn’t.

Closing Line (No Hope Offered)

When truth is allowed but voices are regulated,
freedom dies politely —
and nobody quite notices.

I, the druid Finn, noticed.

The Anonymous Procedure

Procedure without voice

All Finn’s blogs

The Druid Finn’s homepage