The ‘It’ (das ‘Es’) as Universal Procedure

A Procedural Reconstruction of Groddeck’s Ego–It Dynamic

By Bodhangkur

Abstract

This essay reconstructs Georg Groddeck’s theory of the It and the ego through the analytic framework of Finn’s Procedure Monism. Groddeck’s phenomenology of psychophysical determination is interpreted as an intuitive discovery of the functional stratification Finn defines as (1) strategic, pre-conscious procedural operation and (2) tactical, conscious interface behaviour. By formalising Groddeck’s insights in procedural rather than mythopoetic terms, the essay reveals a coherent architecture underlying human experience, symptoms, agency illusions, and identity formation. The result is a unified model in which Groddeck’s “It” corresponds to the Universal Procedure that generates emergents and their behaviour, while the ego corresponds to a short-horizon data-processing interface necessary for local survival.

1. Introduction: From Phenomenology to Procedure

Groddeck’s Book of the It famously asserts that “man does not live; he is lived by the It.” In Groddeck’s view, the ego is a linguistic fiction, constructed to rationalise impulses, symptoms, and decisions engineered by an impersonal life-force. Groddeck saw illness, desire, accident, and emotional reaction as “expressions of the It,” the true operator behind the self.

Finn’s Procedure Monism, by contrast, begins not with phenomenological observation but with a strictly structural claim: all emergent phenomena are instantiations of a universal procedural rule-set, quantised into discrete events that produce identity, realness, and survival functionality. Consciousness is not an operator but a tactical interface—an immediate data-processing module through which the emergent navigates its environment. The “self” is thus metadata, not engine.

This essay integrates these frameworks to show that Groddeck’s It is the Universal Procedure viewed experientially, and Groddeck’s ego is the conscious interface viewed symbolically. Where Groddeck interpreted the It mythically, Finn provides an operational ontology that clarifies its structure and function.

2. Groddeck’s It: A Phenomenological Description of a Procedural Operator

Groddeck attributes to the It four characteristics: priority, creativity, ambiguity, and universality.

1. Priority: The It precedes the ego in both time and function. It determines bodily development, symptom formation, and behavioural impulse.

2. Creativity: The It produces the organism’s drama—its illnesses, loves, phobias, choices, and coincidences.

3. Ambiguity: The It is neither moral nor immoral but expresses contradictory tendencies—nurturing and destructive, playful and cruel.

4. Universality: Everything human is the It’s expression; nothing originates in the ego.

Finn’s Universal Procedure precisely matches these traits, but replaces mythic anthropomorphism with structural clarity:

· priority → UP precedes emergent formation

· creativity → UP generates pattern, identity, and realness through quantised events

· ambiguity → UP balances constraints that may appear contradictory at the interface

· universality → all emergents are UP-instances; none operate independently

Thus the It = UP, but Groddeck experiences from within what Finn describes from outside.

3. The Ego as Fiction vs. the Ego as Tactical Interface

For Groddeck, the ego is a puppet:

· it narrates, but does not cause

· it explains, but does not initiate

· it believes itself autonomous, but its motives are retroactive storytelling

· it exists to satisfy social expectations

· it collapses when confronted with the truth of its impotence

Finn interprets this mechanism procedurally:

The ego = the consciousness interface = tactical data-processing

This interface:

· handles short-term strategic decisions

· prioritises immediate survival

· suppresses overwhelming procedural noise

· delivers a stable sense of “I” in order to enable action

· converts pre-conscious outputs into coherent behavioural plans

· performs post-hoc justification to maintain system coherence

Where Groddeck calls the ego an illusion, Finn calls it an instrument:

The ego is not false; it is a temporary operational display.

Groddeck’s puppet-ego is structurally identical to Finn’s tactical interface:
a constrained surface representation enabling survival of a deeper process.

4. The Strategic–Tactical Distinction:

Reframing Groddeck’s Ego–It Relation

Finn’s theory introduces a crucial distinction:

1. Strategic layer (pre-conscious / It / UP):

o long-horizon pattern integration

o global constraint optimisation

o procedural memory and survival heuristics

o initiation of impulses, affect, and systemic correction

o generation of identity-states

o quantised operation beneath introspective access

2. Tactical layer (consciousness / ego):

o short-horizon attention

o immediate threat/opportunity evaluation

o high-resolution sensory processing

o behavioural execution

o narrative coherence

This mapping resolves Groddeck’s central puzzle:
Why does the ego believe it acts, though it does not?

Because the tactical interface is designed to:

· operate with a narrow temporal window

· assume agency to sustain survival

· integrate real-time data

· suppress awareness of its strategic subordination (to avoid paralysis)

Thus the ego’s illusion of autonomy is not a psychological error but a functional necessity.

5. Illness and Symptom: From Groddeck’s Symbolism to Procedural Feedback

Groddeck’s most controversial claim is that illness is not accidental but expressive: the It uses symptoms to communicate with the ego or to enforce alignment with unconscious wishes.

Finn’s model clarifies this:

· The organism is an equilibrium-seeking structure.

· Deviations from optimal function generate procedural feedback.

· Feedback manifests as discomfort, pain, confusion, symptom, malfunction.

· Consciousness experiences these as “problems,” but the UP interprets them as error signals.

· The symbolic quality Groddeck observed is the ego’s interpretation of systemic correction.

Example:

A person overwhelmed by social obligations may develop exhaustion, headaches, or “accidental” injuries. Groddeck calls this symbolic refusal; Finn calls it systemic overload prompting forced rest. Both describe the same event from different layers of the system.

Thus Groddeck’s “message from the It” becomes Finn’s procedural correction loop.

6. Desire, Drive, and Infantility: Procedural Energy and Survival Heuristics

Groddeck interprets all psychological and bodily impulses as erotic or infantile impulses of the It. Finn restates this in procedural terms:

· “Erotic energy” = directional procedural momentum

· “Infantility” = primordial survival heuristics

· “Contradiction” = multi-constraint optimisation in complex environments

· “Desire” = interface-level rendering of procedural directional bias

· “Pleasure/Pain” = feedback signalling path-viability

Where Groddeck saw the It as a mythic child directing the body’s fate, Finn sees a procedural optimisation engine balancing competing constraints.

7. Agency: Groddeck’s Puppet vs. Finn’s Constrained Autonomy

Groddeck holds that agency is entirely illusory.
The ego acts only as the It’s mouthpiece.

Finn refines the claim:

· Agency exists locally, within constraint fields.

· The tactical interface selects among procedural outputs but does not generate them.

· The emergent is not a passive puppet but an operational node within the UP.

· Autonomy is partial, scaffolded, and dependent on deeper procedural momentum.

Thus the reconciliation:

Groddeck is right about origin; Finn is right about function.
The It (UP) sets the field of possibility; the ego navigates within it.

8. Identity: A Groddeckian Fiction, a Procedural Configuration

For Groddeck, identity is a story the ego tells.
For Finn, identity is a dynamic configuration of quantised events:

· created

· bounded

· iterated

· maintained against entropy

· dissolved when no longer viable

Identity thus becomes the interface-level expression of deeper procedural dynamics.

Example:

A person “choosing” a career path is procedurally selecting among viable constraint-compatible trajectories generated by UP. The ego narrates this selection as a story of personal preference or destiny; the UP treats it as system-level optimisation.

9. Integrated Model: The It as Universal Procedure

We may now summarise the integrated theory:

Strategic (Pre-conscious / It / UP)

· impersonal

· quantised

· long-horizon

· constraint-optimising

· generates impulses, identity, memory

· performs survival operations

· corrects deviation through feedback

· expresses through body and behaviour

· fundamentally prior

· real operator

Tactical (Conscious / Ego / Interface)

· local

· short-horizon

· sensory-rich

· illusion of autonomy

· narrative rationalisation

· behavioural execution

· interprets feedback as emotion or symptom

· necessary for situational navigation

· derivative

· operational mask

Their relationship:

· UP generates → interface interprets

· interface acts → UP evaluates

· misalignment → feedback

· coherence → survival

The ego is not dethroned—it is contextualised.

The It is not mystical—it is procedural.

10. Conclusion: The Architect and the Mask

Groddeck intuited the presence of a deeper operator beneath human consciousness. Finn provides its architecture. Together they produce the following thesis:

The human being is the tactical face of a strategic procedural engine.
Consciousness is the mask; the Universal Procedure is the architect.

The ego is not fraudulent; it is functional.
The It is not magical; it is procedural.
Life is not driven by a personal inner agent; it is conducted by a universal rule-set instantiated as local emergents.

In this synthesis, Groddeck’s mythic It becomes recognisable as the deep structure of Finn’s Procedure Monism:
the generative core of realness, identity, correction, and survival that operates beneath the fragile brilliance of consciousness.

Beyond Freud

The druid as deniable messenger

Home