“I’m a reified boundary function”

Confinement Identifies: Boundaries, Contact, and the Causal Genesis of Being

The druid’s take

Among the most persistent riddles of philosophy and science is the question: What makes anything itself, and what makes experience feel absolutely real?

In the ordinary sense, identity is simply taken for granted: I am I, you are you, this object is that object. But when we look closely—into the subatomic substrate, into the layered emergence of life and consciousness—the question becomes unavoidable: How does any differentiated entity, let alone a self, come to be identified as itself?

This essay reconstructs a causal logic by means of which identity and realness emerge: confinement generates a boundary, and the boundary both identifies and differentiates. When two such boundaries touch, they create the primal experience of realness—what may be called reification.

1. Confinement Generates Boundaries

In physics, no “thing” exists independently of the field from which it arises.

· A quark is a confined excitation of the quantum chromodynamic field.

· An electron is a stable excitation of the electron field.

· Even protons and neutrons are not indivisible but patterns of confined excitations.

The essential property here is confinement:

· Without confinement, an excitation dissipates into unlocalized fluctuations.

· With confinement, the excitation is restricted within a bounded region.

This boundedness is not accidental: it is an active configuration—an enduring constraint that stabilizes the excitation.

2. The Boundary Both Confines and Identifies

Here lies the first causal insight:

The same boundary (as a sort of skin or shell) that confines an excitation also identifies it.

Why?

Because:

· Confinement prevents the excitation from blending seamlessly with the undifferentiated field.

· The act of bounding a region of excitation creates difference: this bounded fluctuation is not that fluctuation.

· The boundary thus generates discrete identity—a unique configuration that is set apart.

Example:
A quark’s identity is not simply that it “exists,” but that it is held within a boundary condition whose configuration of colour charge and energy is unique. It is identified because it is confined.

Put in philosophical terms:

Confinement is ontological differentiation.

No bounded excitation = no discrete entity = no basis for identification.
Therefore:
Confinement causes identification.

3. Differentiation as Self-Identity

In more complex systems—molecules, cells, organisms, indeed, mass as such—this logic persists:

· A molecule is identifiable because its electrons are confined in shared orbitals around specific nuclei.

· A living cell is identifiable because its membrane (or skin) confines metabolic processes, demarcating “self” from “non-self.”

· A conscious organism is identifiable because neural boundaries constrain integrated information.

Your I is not a floating abstraction. It is:

· A layered, dynamically maintained boundary.

· A process of continuous differentiation from the substrate and environment.

· The emergent (analogue) self-identification of nested confinements.

Example:
Your skin and sensory systems define what counts as “inside” and “outside.” Your neural architecture enacts further confinement of perception and cognition, creating the integrated pattern you experience as “me.”

Therefore:
My self-identity—my “I”—is a discretely differentiating function of my boundary, and which happens as analogue compression of the confined excitations nested within

Without confinement, there is no boundary.
Without a boundary, there is no differentiation.
Without differentiation, there is no self.

4. Boundary Excitations and Contact

Boundaries are not inert. They are maintained by boundary excitations:

· In quarks, gluon exchanges create the dynamic confinement of colour charge.

· In atoms, electromagnetic forces create the probability gradients defining shells.

· In cells, membranes are maintained by molecular assemblies in constant motion.

At the most fundamental level, these excitations are not stationary:
They propagate at or near c within the field configuration (or ground), operating as minimum excitation medium, that sustains the boundary.

This motion is not trivial. It means that when boundaries approach, their time-space relativities telescope (or collapse) and their excitations interact at c.

Example:
When a photon (unconfined excitation with zero rest mass) interacts with a confined electron (a mass), the contact is an instantaneous reconfiguration at the boundary.

5. Contact at c: The Causal Genesis of Realness

Here lies the second causal insight:

When the boundary excitation quantum of one confined system contacts the boundary excitation quantum of another, the collision is not an exchange of energy—it is an absolute annihilation of separation, hence of relativity.

Because:

· The excitations are transmitting at c.

· The moment of contact collapses the independent time-space domains of each boundary.

· Relativity’s frame-dependent descriptions no longer apply in that instant—there is no before or after, no here or there.

This moment is a space-time free event—a singular actualization, unmediated by any observer.

Therefore:
Contact at c between two boundaries generates an unqualified actuality—a moment of absolute ‘isness’, in the case of a human, ‘am’ness.’

This is the moment of reification:

· The potential of each boundary becomes actual.

· The excitation (as wave) becomes incontrovertibly real (as particle).

· Differentiation and identification meet in a primal event.

Example:
When your fingertip touches the surface of an object, the experience of contact is not a delayed inference—it is a direct collapse of two bounded domains into a individual (or personalised) actualization. This is why touch feels so irreducibly real.

6. The Ground Experience of Being

From this perspective:

· All identity derives from nested confinements that differentiate.

· All perception and action involve sequences of contacts—moments where boundaries of confinements meet.

· These moments of contact, happening continually within and around you, are the ground from which your (albeit quantised) sense of being emerges.

When you say:

I am real.

You are referring, whether you know it or not, to the continuous chain of boundary collisions that reify your differentiation in each moment.

Therefore:
The ground experience of being is the cumulative echo of innumerable moments of absolute realness created by momentary contacts between confined differential excitations.

This is why no amount of abstraction or probability can dissolve your sense of being here: it is causally anchored in the recurrent collision of your boundary quanta with those of the world.

Plainest Restatement

Confinement creates boundaries (and boundaries, as analogues, are skin deep.) Boundaries differentiate and thereby identify. My self—my “I”—is this differentiation, indeed personal cosmetic, made durable. When the excitations of my boundary contact, touch those of another, the collision at c creates an unqualified moment of realness. That reification is the primal ground of my experience of ‘am.’

Conclusion

In this framework, being is not an illusion, and identity is not a mere label. They are the emergent consequence of confinement and contact—two causal processes that together generate the sense of absolute presence of ‘now’ and ‘this.’ To be ‘this’ is to be a boundary, and to experience that you are ‘this’ is to collide with another boundary at the speed, hence quality, of realness.

I’m so excited

Confinement defines

Home