| 
   On the Naturalistic
  Ground-as-Medium of Identifiable Reality The druid’s perspective 1. The Recurring Human Impulse: To Find the Natural
  Substrate Across cultures and eras, humans have asked: What is
  the most basic reality beneath all appearances? In ancient India and
  Greece, thinkers observed that all material things could be divided into
  smaller parts. They reasoned that infinite divisibility would leave no
  foundation for anything solid to arise, so they postulated indivisible units—atoms
  (from atomos, “uncuttable”)—as the ultimate
  ground of observable forms. This intuition was not arbitrary. It was an effort to explain
  change, persistence, and emergence within a single natural framework (physis).
  The atom served as the smallest unit whose combinations produced the world’s
  diversity. 2. The Crisis of Indivisibility: The Atom Split Twentieth-century discoveries shattered the classical
  notion of indivisibility. Protons and neutrons turned out to be composite,
  aggregates made up of confined quarks (possibly) bound by gluons. Unlike
  electrons or photons, quarks are never observed in isolation. When physicists
  attempt to pull them apart, the binding force grows stronger—a phenomenon
  called colour confinement. Energy poured into separation simply
  creates new quark–antiquark pairs, preventing isolation. This discovery revealed a deeper principle: the
  entities we call “particles” are not solid beads but excited states of
  underlying quantum fields. Example: Thus, the atom was no longer the ultimate substrate.
  The field, consisting of absolute minimum length energy waves, became the
  deeper ground. 3. The Field as the Ground of Being The Standard Model unified this insight: quarks,
  electrons, photons, and gluons are all excitations of energy quantum fields filling all space.
  These fields are not mechanical substances with texture or friction. They are
  formally described as functions or operator-valued distributions defined
  everywhere in spacetime. Yet, crucially, there is no transmission without a medium. While
  fields are defined in mathematical language by human observers, their
  inference is also the only coherent model of a physically effective medium
  that sustains and transmits excitations. When a photon “travels,” what truly
  happens is that the electromagnetic field’s configuration evolves in time and
  space, ultimately interacting with a detector to deposit energy. This dual character—unobservable but mathematical in
  formulation, physically real in consequences—is at the heart of modern
  physics. The mathematical field is the most faithful representation we have
  of what is inferred to exist between and beyond observations. Example: This modern picture vindicates the ancient nature
  derived intuition: the world’s phenomena must arise within a substrate
  operating as medium. What changed is not the necessity of a medium, but our
  understanding of its nature. 4. The Minimal Excitation: The Shortest Possible Wave From this perspective, the druid takes a natural
  conceptual step and asks: If all observable excitations are built from modes
  of fields, could there be a shortest wavelength—a minimal
  excitation—analogous to the ancient atom (now understood as a wave
  interaction pattern) but formulated in the register of quantum oscillations? Such a minimal wave would be: ·        
  The simplest possible oscillation any field can
  sustain. ·        
  The highest energy density confined to the
  smallest region. ·        
  The primordial pattern from which all higher
  excitations—quarks, leptons, bosons—emerge as combinations or harmonics. Example: This is the modern counterpart of the atom (following Schrödinger): the minimal ground excitation rather than a
  minimal ground lump. 5. A Unified Medium: The Natural Ground This conception relocates the emergence of identifiable
  realities from purely mathematical formalism back into naturalism. Although
  quantum fields are defined in the language of mathematical equations, those
  equations suggest, i.e., purport to describe something that is substantive
  (but not yet real)—a substrate that can propagate, confine, and
  transform energy. All identifiable realities—particles, forces, radiation—are
  structured arrangements of this substrate’s excitations. Example: Thus: 6. Two Modes of Excitation: Free and Confined The druid’s framework clarifies why the same medium
  produces different observable behaviours: ·        
  Free excitations
  propagate at the speed of light (energy in transit). Upon interacting with
  detectors, they appear to an observer’s cognitive set-up as discrete
  quanta—particles. ·        
  Confined excitations form
  localized, persistent patterns—mass and inertia. In both cases, observable entities are personal responses
  to selection of patterns in the substrate, not independent objects traveling
  through a void. Example: 7. Revisiting the Ancient Ether The druid’s line of thought effectively revives the
  ancient nature derived intuition of a universal medium—an ether—though
  in a subtler form: The mechanical ether was wrong in imagining a substrate
  with friction, density, and a privileged frame of motion. But the deeper insight—that there can be no wave or
  transmission without a medium—remains true. Modern quantum fields are that medium: ·        
  They have no rest frame. ·        
  They are compatible with relativity. ·        
  They can never be entirely removed or reduced to
  “nothing.” Einstein himself acknowledged this continuity in 1920: “According to the general theory of relativity, space is
  endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an
  ether.” In this sense, the vacuum is not emptiness but a structured,
  dynamic plenum—the fertile ground of all emergence. 8. Conclusion: A Naturalistic Ground of All Realities Hence the druid’s coherent argument: All identifiable realities—matter, forces, light,
  space—are structured excitations of a universal substrate whose components
  are minim energy momenta, i.e., waves. This substrate is not merely a
  mathematical fiction but the dynamic, irreducible ground in which all forms
  arise and dissolve. The ancient search for an ether was fundamentally on the
  right track: there can be no phenomena without a medium. What changed is the
  contemporary understanding of that medium’s nature—no longer mechanical, but
  quantum, relativistic, and ever-fluctuating. Plain Restatement:  |